10 working days
Plan AB Global Holding / Institutional diagnostic
AI Readiness & Transformation Roadmap
A decision-ready view of where AI can help, what must change first, and how to move without losing trust or control.
Discuss this engagement →View a sample output ↓A focused first engagementIndicative duration Starting scope Working format
Start with AI Readiness Sprint.
One business unit, up to five stakeholder interviews and three priority workflows.
Kickoff, discovery interviews, workflow review and a decision workshop.
Leave with: A prioritized use-case shortlist and a 90-day roadmap with named owners.
What we need from you: A senior sponsor, a workflow owner and access to non-sensitive process documentation.
This is a suggested starting format. Scope, schedule, availability and fees are confirmed in a written proposal before kickoff.
Request a starter proposal →The challenge
Where the work begins.
Many institutions have pilots, tools and enthusiasm—but no shared view of priorities, ownership or risk. We turn scattered activity into an executable direction.
Who it is for: Government, enterprises, education and impact institutions seeking a credible starting point.
How we work01 / Discover 02 / Prioritize 03 / Design 04 / Mobilize
A focused path from question to action.
Discover
Leadership interviews, workflow mapping and a practical assessment of data, skills, governance and current AI use.
Prioritize
Score a focused set of use cases for value, feasibility, risk and institutional readiness.
Design
Define decision rights, safeguards, capability needs and an adoption sequence.
Mobilize
Agree owners, milestones, measures and a 90-day starting plan.
What you receive
Tangible outputs.
Scope and timing are agreed with you; these are the core deliverables we would shape around your context.
- AI readiness and gap map
- Prioritized use-case portfolio
- Governance and decision-rights outline
- 90-day roadmap with owners and measures
In practice
What the first working session looks like
Leaders and delivery teams review real workflows together, identify a few high-value decisions, and leave with a shortlist worth testing—not an abstract maturity score.
See the work
What a working output looks like.
Illustrative sample · fictional scenario · no client dataA 90-day transformation roadmap
| When | Working decision | Evidence of progress |
|---|---|---|
| Days 1–30 | Map knowledge search; confirm data boundaries and accountable owner. | Approved scope, baseline search time and a test set. |
| Days 31–60 | Pilot an internal assistant with source citations and human review. | Accuracy, citation quality and time-to-answer measured against baseline. |
| Days 61–90 | Review results and choose whether to extend, revise or stop. | Sponsor signs a documented decision and a next-stage scope. |
Open the working brief
- Priority use case
- Internal knowledge search for one team.
- Decision gate
- Proceed only when a data owner approves the sources and test criteria.
- Accountability
- Business sponsor owns value; IT owns access; users validate answers.
- Measure
- Track verified answer quality and task completion time, not tool usage alone.
This sample shows the structure and level of specificity of a deliverable. The final output is built around your workflows, people and agreed scope.
Next step
Start a conversation →Bring us the real challenge.
We will frame the right starting engagement around your context and decision.